Cases 1 - 10 of 22
HOLMES v. WELLPATH et al
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
WINDEL HOLMES
Defendant:
WELLPATH, RNS BRAD AVENALI, SUPERINTENDENT SCOTT KLINEFELTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CHAMBERS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
EBONY CHAMBERS and ROBERT TAYLOR
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, BLANCHE CARNEY, MICHELLE FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OWENS v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2022cv00159
Petitioner:
STEPHEN OWENS
Respondent:
BLANCHE CARNEY, JOHN/JANE DOE #1, JOHN/JANE DOE #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OWENS v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN OWENS
Defendant:
BLANCHE CARNEY, PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF PRISONS COMMISSIONER, JOHN/JANE DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUTERA v. PRIME CARE et al
as 2:2020cv04691
Defendant:
NURSE JANE DOE - 10, NURSE JANE DOE - 1, NURSE JANE DOE - 4 and others
Plaintiff:
DAMON BUTERA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAMOS v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL et al
as 2:2019cv03816
Defendant:
HANUSCHAK, JANE DOE 1, HANS and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH RAMOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PETERKIN v. CAPOZZA et al
as 2:2019cv00366
Defendant:
DEPUTY ERIC AMEL, JOHN DOE #5, JOHN DOE #4 and others
Plaintiff:
AL-TARIQ PETERKIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Dixon v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv01827
Plaintiff:
Denise Dixon
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, John E. Wetzel, Robert Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2015cv00457
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL JACKSON
Defendant:
LOUIS FOLINO, JOHN DOE # 1, JOHN DOE # 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KOKINDA v. JIN et al
as 2:2015cv00179
Plaintiff:
JASON KOKINDA
Defendant:
BYUNGHAK JIN, MICHELLE DIGGS, IRMA VIHLIDAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
