Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Dunn v. Parker et al
as 1:2019cv01080
Defendant:
Jennifer Williams, Arvil Chapman, Jane Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Watson et al
as 1:2018cv00002
Plaintiff:
Raymond Cox
Defendant:
Eric Watson, John Beavers, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Whiteville Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2017cv01083
Plaintiff:
Winfred Wright
Defendant:
Whiteville Correctional Facility, Matthews, Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Doe et al
as 3:2016cv00460
Plaintiff:
Carl Hamilton
Defendant:
Jane Doe #1, Jane Doe #2, Centurion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kuot v. John Doe Medical Contractor et al
as 1:2016cv00006
Plaintiff:
Gai Kuot
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Damon Hininger, President of C.C.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Poore et al v. Holt et al
as 3:2012cv00906
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Poore, James Coffey, Michael Bigbee and others
Defendant:
William Holt, Tony Crawford, John/Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Slaughter v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2012cv01178
Plaintiff:
Trammel Dewain Slaughter
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Joe Easterling, Hardeman Count Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nunn v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2012cv00245
Plaintiff:
Scotty V Nunn
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Sullivan County, Tennessee, Wayne Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nunn v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2012cv00282
Plaintiff:
Scotty V Nunn
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Sullivan County, Tennessee, Wayne Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Fayette County Commissioners et al
as 2:2008cv02289
Plaintiff:
James Walker
Defendant:
Fayette County Commissioners, The County of Fayette, Fayette County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
