Cases 41 - 50 of 92
PALMITER v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY et al
as 2:2017cv00093
Plaintiff:
JASON PALMITER
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, KEVIN JOYCE, JOHN DOE ONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EDSON v. LEPAGE et al
as 1:2016cv00079
Plaintiff:
ARLENE EDSON
Defendant:
PAUL L LEPAGE , RIVERVIEW PSYCHIATRIC CENTER , MAINE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DREWRY v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2016cv00075
Plaintiff:
BRANDON B DREWRY
Defendant:
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOSEPH FITZPATRICK, RODNEY BOUFFARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NOONAN v. YORK COUNTY et al
as 2:2016cv00014
Plaintiff:
SHANE NOONAN
Defendant:
YORK COUNTY, MAURICE OUELLETTE, JAY BONDAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IRISH et al v. STATE OF MAINE et al
as 1:2015cv00503
Plaintiff:
BRITTANY IRISH and KIMBERLY IRISH
Defendant:
STATE OF MAINE, STATE POLICE OF THE STATE OF MAINE and JOHN AND/OR JANE DOES STATE POLICE OFFICERS 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PELLETIER v. LANDRY et al
as 2:2015cv00269
Plaintiff:
DAVID R PELLETIER
Defendant:
SCOTT R LANDRY, JOSEPH FITZPATRICK, SHAWN EMERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SWETT v. SOMERSET COUNTY et al
as 1:2015cv00155
Plaintiff:
PAMELA SWETT
Defendant:
SOMERSET COUNTY, BARRY DELONG, JEFFREY JACQUES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOE v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2015cv00105
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
GREENWOOD et al v. WAL-MART STORES EAST LP et al
as 1:2015cv00099
Plaintiff:
DONALD M GREENWOOD and MARCHETA B GREENWOOD
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST LP and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
