Cases 1 - 6 of 6
In Re Meta Pixel Healthcare Litigation
as 3:2022cv03580
Plaintiff:
John Doe, Doe, John Doe II and others
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Michael Krackenberger, The Regents of the University of California and others
Petitioner:
JANE DOE
Intervenor Defendant:
Dignity Health Medical Foundation
Interested Party:
Katrina Calderon and Danielle Calderon
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Nancy Murphy, Robert Stewart, Alistair Stewart and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Advocate Aurora Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Property
Doe I et al v. Google LLC
as 3:2023cv02431
Plaintiff:
John Doe I, John Doe II, Jane Doe I and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Property
Winston Smith, et al v. Facebook, Inc., et al
as 17-16206
Defendant / Appellee:
FACEBOOK, INC.
Defendant:
CLEVELAND CLINIC, UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS - MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER, BJC HEALTHCARE and others
Amicus Curiae:
ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANE DOE II, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, JANE DOE I and WINSTON SMITH
Smith et al v. Facebook, Inc. et al
as 5:2016cv01282
Defendant:
Facebook, Inc, Facebook, Inc., BJC Healthcare and others
Plaintiff:
Smith, Jane Doe I, Winston Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Property
Winston Smith, et al v. Facebook, Inc., et al
as 17-16206
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WINSTON SMITH, JANE DOE I and JANE DOE II, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
FACEBOOK, INC.
Defendant:
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY, INC., AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, INC., MELANOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION and others
Motion, Inc. v. Levine et al
as 1:2015cv01772
Defendant:
Jane Doe I, John Doe I, John Doe II and others
Individuals Whose Identities Are Yet Unknown:
Jane Doe II
Plaintiff:
Motion, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
