Cases 1 - 10 of 34
DOVEL v. LANCASTER COUNTY et al
as 2:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
TAMALA KATHLEEN DOVEL
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY, WARDEN PAUL SMEAL, CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS JOHN/JANE DOE#'S 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv03683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
HARPER v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2023cv01433
Plaintiff:
SHEILA HARPER
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY, ORLANDO HARPER, JOHN/JANE DOE(S) 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
AMOS v. MCDONOUGH et al
as 2:2023cv00965
Plaintiff:
MARCI JONES AMOS
Defendant:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, MICHAEL MANGIONE, MARY HOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BARTLEY et al v. RINKER et al
as 2:2022cv00164
Plaintiff:
MEGAN BARTLEY and MICHAEL BARTLEY
Defendant:
JAIME RINKER, JEFFERSON COUNTY JAIL, DUSTIN MYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Batty v. Walmart, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv02370
Defendant:
Springettsbury Township, Springettsbury Township Police Officers John/Jane Does #s 1-5, Springettsbury Township Police Officer Jamie Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Latoya Batty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
BURKLAND v. CARCELLA et al
as 2:2020cv00396
Defendant:
JOHN DOE NO. 3, MICHAEL CARCELLA, JOHN DOE NO. 4 and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN WINTHROP BURKLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
SEAWRIGHT v. BANNING et al
as 2:2018cv04811
Defendant:
OFFICER PATRICK BANNING and JOHN JOHN/JANE DOE OFFICERS 1-7
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SEAWRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRAWFORD v. CORIZON HEALTH, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00113
Plaintiff:
ANDREA CRAWFORD
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH, INC. , CORIZON, INC. , ALLEGHENY COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KORNEGEY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv00392
Plaintiff:
ANTOINE KORNEGEY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , HOUSE OF CORRECTIONS , LOUIS GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
