Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Jones v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2018cv02357
Defendant:
Huffman, Scott Miller, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Marcellus A Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams a/k/a Stewart v. Secy' John E. Wetzel et al
as 1:2018cv02055
Defendant:
R.H.U., P.O. John Doe, G.C. Jane Hinman, C.I.S. John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2018cv01134
Plaintiff:
James Smith
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Theresa Delbaso, Bernedette Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meade v. Delbaso et al
as 3:2018cv00709
Plaintiff:
Albert Meade
Defendant:
Theresea Delbaso , D Boyles , Janine MacKnight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2017cv02180
Plaintiff:
Marcellus Jones
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Shirley Smeal, Michael Wenerowicz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zamichieli v. Delbalso et al
as 3:2017cv01898
Plaintiff:
Lamont Zamichieli
Defendant:
Theresa Delbalso, Vuksta, Beggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin Williams v. Pennsylvania Department of Cor, et al
as 16-2656
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN KERESTES, PROGRAM REVIEW COMMITTEE and others
Johnson v. Kane et al
as 1:2015cv01361
Plaintiff:
Akil Johnson
Defendant:
Kathleen G. Kane, Kerestes, Brenda Tritt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. PA Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv00975
Plaintiff:
Kevin Williams
Defendant:
PA Department of Corrections, John Kerestes, Program Review Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHELBO v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2015cv00344
Plaintiff:
PETER SHELBO
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, John Kerestes, Sorba and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
