Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Price v. Centurion of Delaware, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01062
Plaintiff:
Millard E. Price
Defendant:
Centurion of Delaware, LLC, Vital Core, Inc., Monroe Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Centurion of Delaware, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv01635
Plaintiff:
Millard E. Price
Defendant:
Centurion of Delaware, LLC, Correct RX Pharmacy Services, Inc., Monroe Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown et al v. Centurian of Delaware, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00923
Plaintiff:
Jenail Brown, Jeremy Cartwright, Jeffrey Clayton and others
Defendant:
Centurian of Delaware, LLC, Correct RX Pharmacy Services, Inc., Monroe Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendez v. Three of the Judges of the Supreme Court of Mexico City et al
as 1:2018cv00957
Plaintiff:
Ivan L. Mendez
Defendant:
Three of the Judges of the Supreme Court of Mexico City, Judge Ms. Or Mr. Jane or John Doe I, Judge Ms. Or Mr. Jane or John Doe II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendez v. Three of the Judges of the Supreme Court of Mexico City et al
as 1:2018mc00180
Plaintiff:
Ivan L. Mendez
Defendant:
Three of the Judges of the Supreme Court of Mexico City, Judge Ms. Or Mr. Jane or John Doe I, Judge Ms. Or Mr. Jane or John Doe II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Sexton et al
as 1:2016cv00598
Plaintiff:
Augustus Hebrew Evans, Jr.
Defendant:
Lezley Sexton, Christine Francis, Debra Mozzeralli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newton v. City of Wilmington et al
as 1:2016cv00267
Plaintiff:
Sye C. Newton
Defendant:
City of Wilmington, Ipek Kurul, Brian Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baylis v. Morgan et al
as 1:2010cv00518
Plaintiff:
Leonard K. Baylis
Defendant:
Phillip Morgan and Jane or John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
