Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
True the Vote, Inc. v. IRS, et al
as 23-5238
Plaintiff / Appellee: True the Vote, Inc.
Defendant / Appellant: Internal Revenue Service, United States of America, Steven T. Miller, In his official and Indivicual capacity as former Deputy Commissioner, Services & Enforcement, and Acting Commissioner, Internal Revenue Service and others
Interested Party: Public Interest Legal Foundation, Inc., Bopp Law Firm, PC and Foley and Lardner, LLP
Keith Allen, et al v. DC
as 21-7142
Plaintiff / Appellant: Keith Allen, Wanda Gertrude Allen, Keith Dominick Allen, a minor by his mother and next friend; in her own behalf and as next friend K.D.A., Lashell Laura Gaskins, in her own behalf and as next friend of T.D.G. and others
Defendant / Appellee: District of Columbia, a municipal corporation
Wanda Allen, et al v. DC
as 15-7096
Plaintiff - Appellant: Wanda Gertrude Allen, Keith Dominick Allen, a minor by his mother and next friend; in her own behalf and as next friend K.D.A. 03-2139, Lashell Laura Gaskins, in her own behalf, TYESHA D'ANNIOTTE GASKINS, a minor by her mother and next friend ; 00-592; in her own behalf and as next friend of T.D.G. 03-2193, Twanna Jones, in her own behalf, DARRELL MARQUEAL JONES, a minor by his mother and next friend ; 00-593, in her own behalf and as next friend of D.M.J. 03-2139 and others
Plaintiff - Appellee: Chelsea School, 99-3188
Defendant - Appellee: District of Columbia, a municipal corporation
True the Vote, Inc. v. IRS, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-5316
Plaintiff - Appellant: True the Vote, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee: Internal Revenue Service, United States of America, Steven L. Miller, In his official and Individual capacity as former Deputy Commissioner, Services & Enforcement, and Acting Commissioner, Internal Revenue Service and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-5295
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Montgomery Akers v. Harrell Watts, et al
as 10-5336
Plaintiff - Appellant: Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant - Appellee: Harrell Watts, Nation Appeals Coordinator, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Michael Nalley, Regional Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, R. Wiley, Warden, US Pentientiary-ADX, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
In re: Seizure of Approximately
as 10-5025
In Re: In re: Seizure of Approximately $12,116,153.16 and Accrued Interest in United States Currency
Petitioner - Appellee: United States of America
Movant - Appellant: Law Offices of Bernard D'orazio
Respondent - Appellee: $1,026,455.90 w/Accrued Interest Formerly Contained in Account Number 45200491, and Known as the Avion Resources Ltd. Account, Held in the Name of Gustavo Zerfan Haber and Michael Homci Haber, $1,343,746.05 w/Accrued Interest Formerly Contained in Account Number 45200483, a/k/a the Chettier Business, Inc. Account, Held in the Name of Janine Ribiero and Joacyr Reinando, $1,510,379.08 w/Accrued Interest Formerly Contained in Account Number 9006863, a/k/a the Farswiss Asset Management Ltd. Account, Held in the Name of Ruy Ulhoa Cintra Araujo and others
In re: Seizure of Approx. $12 Million
as 10-5025
Respondent / Appellee: $1,624,717.06 w/Accrued Interest Formerly Contained in Account Number 9010133, a/k/a the Midland Financial Inc., Account, Held in the Name of Henrique Lamberti and Marianel Gandolfo, $86,401.27 w/Accrued Interest Formerly Contained in Account Number 9200172, a/k/a the Pompeu Main Account, Held in the Name of Pompeu Costa Lima Pinheiro Maia, $1,343,746.05 w/Accrued Interest Formerly Contained in Account Number 45200483, a/k/a the Chettier Business, Inc. Account, Held in the Name of Janine Ribiero and Joacyr Reinando and others
Petitioner / Appellant: Law Offices of Bernard D'orazio
In Re: In re: Seizure of Approximately $12,116,153.16 and Accrued Interest in United States Currency
Petitioner: United States of America

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?