Cases 1 - 10 of 43
In re Air Cargo Shipping Servi
as 11-5464
Plaintiff / Appellant:
One of more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3993, Alluvion Inc. v. ACE Aviation Holdings, Inc. et al.,, One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3001, Maria's Collections, Inc. v. Air France-KLM et al, One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3184, Printing Technologies, Inc. v. Deutsche Lufthansa AG and others
Plaintiff:
One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3985, Harry Okabe Flowers v. Ace Aviation Holdings, Inc et al, One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-984, Spraying Systems CO. v. Ace Aviation Holdings, Inc. et al., One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-3976, Lynn Culver v. Air Canada et al and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Thule, Inc., EL AL Israel Airlines, One or more Defendants in 06-cv-827, Helen's Wooden Crafting Co. v. Air Canada et al and others
Defendant:
Swiss International Air Lines Ltd., One or more Defendants in 06-cv-3184, Printing Technologies, Inc. v. Deutsche Lufthansa AG, Lufthansa Cargo AG and others
Debtor:
In re: Air Cargo Shipping Services Antitrust Litigation
Donald Wortman, et al v. Vietnam Airlines, et al
as 11-16425
:
In re: TRANSPACIFIC PASSENGER AIR TRANSPORTATION ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DONALD WORTMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, WILLIAM ADAMS, MARGARET GARCIA and others
Defendant:
AIR NEW ZEALAND, ALL NIPPON AIRWAYS, CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS and others
Defendant - Appellant:
VIETNAM AIRLINES
Donald Wortman, et al v. Thai Airways International, et al
as 11-16340
:
In re: TRANSPACIFIC PASSENGER AIR TRANSPORTATION ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DONALD WORTMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, WILLIAM ADAMS, MARGARET GARCIA and others
Defendant:
AIR NEW ZEALAND, ALL NIPPON AIRWAYS, CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS and others
Defendant - Appellant:
THAI AIRWAYS INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC COMPANY LTD.
IRIS CORP V JAPAN AIRLINES
as 10-1051
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Iris Corporation, Iris Corporation, Iris Corporation and others
Defendant-Appellee:
Japan Airlines International Company, Ltd., Japan Airlines International Company, Ltd., Japan Airlines International Company, Ltd. and others
Allianz Marine & Aviation Versicherungs AG et al v. Japan Airlines International Company, Ltd. et al
as 2:2009cv03911
Plaintiff:
Allianz Marine & Aviation Versicherungs AG and Allianz Corporate and Specialty AG
Defendant:
Japan Airlines International Company, Ltd., "K" Line Logistics, Ltd., "K" Line Logistics, Ltd. and others
Cross Claimant:
"K" Line Logistics, Ltd., "K" Line Logistics, Ltd., "K" Line Logistics (U.S.A.), Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Japan Airlines International Company, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Company of America v. Japan Airlines International Co. Ltd. et al
as 1:2009cv04696
Plaintiff:
Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
Japan Airlines International Co. Ltd. and Japan Airlines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Stephen Gaffigan v. Air New Zealand et al
as 3:2009cv01644
Plaintiff:
Stephen Gaffigan, Stephen Gaffigan, Stephen Gaffigan and others
Defendant:
Air New Zealand, All Nippon Airways, Cathay Pacific Airways and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MacDonald v. Ace Aviation Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv01172
Plaintiff:
Susan MacDonald
Defendant:
Ace Aviation Holdings, Inc., Aerolineas Brasileiras S.A., Air Canada and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
David F Murphy et al v. Air New Zealand et al
as 3:2008cv03786
Plaintiff:
David F Murphy, David F Murphy, David F Murphy and others
Defendant:
Air New Zealand, All Nippon Airways, Cathay Pacific Airways and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fireman's Fund Insurance Company v. Nippon Express U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02257
Plaintiff:
Fireman's Fund Insurance Company and Fireman's Fund Insurance Company
Defendant:
Nippon Express U.S.A., Inc. and Japan Airlines International Company, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
