Cases 1 - 10 of 12
White v. USA
as 5:2024cv00043
Petitioner:
Jason Paul White
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Schaefer v. Warden, USP Beaumont
as 1:2022cv00440
Petitioner:
Jason Paul Schaefer
Respondent:
Warden, USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Schaefer v. Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2022cv00436
Plaintiff:
Jason Paul Schaefer
Defendant:
Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons, FNU Dobbs, FNU Blackman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Archer v. Sweet et al
as 4:2022cv03238
Plaintiff:
Jason Paul Archer
Defendant:
Christopher Sweet, I. Santillanes, Charles H. Bonsal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Childs v. Medical Department of Hutchins Unit et al
as 3:2021cv03097
Plaintiff:
Jason Paul Childs
Defendant:
Medical Department of Hutchins Unit, FNU Reddy and FNU Merida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. USA
as 3:2017cv01049
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jason Paul Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Goldsby v. Smith Laydown & Casing Services, LLC et al
as 7:2016cv00303
Plaintiff:
Jason Paul Goldsby
Defendant:
Jeff Smith and Smith Laydown & Casing Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Ancira et al v. Kusmenko
as 4:2015cv03482
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Ancira and Melinda Wiggins
Defendant:
Jason Paul Kusmenko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Combee v. Batts
as 1:2015cv00151
Petitioner:
Jason Paul Combee
Respondent:
Myron L Batts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Aguillon et al v. Performance Contractors, Inc
as 1:2013cv00382
Plaintiff:
Jairo Aguillon , All Plaintiffs , Alejandro Aguillon-Quintanilla and others
Defendant:
Performance Contractors, Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
