Cases 1 - 10 of 35
THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv22523
Plaintiff:
JASON THOMAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ERBECKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv06530
Plaintiff:
JASON THOMAS ERBECKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PIGAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv08759
Plaintiff:
JASON THOMAS PIGAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jason Thomas Copley et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv00827
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, Tyco Fire Products LP and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Thomas Copley and Lauren Copley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
LIFUR v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv02062
Plaintiff:
JASON THOMAS LIFUR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GARVIN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16326
Plaintiff:
JASON THOMAS GARVIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GREENE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14095
Plaintiff:
JASON THOMAS GREENE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv01673
Plaintiff:
JASON THOMAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETLY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Torres v. Oliver et al
as 5:2021cv00113
Plaintiff:
Fructuoso Torres
Defendant:
Jason Thomas Oliver and Progressive Transportation, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv37907
Plaintiff:
JASON THOMAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
