Cases 1 - 10 of 90
William A Noguera v. Jeanne Woodford
as 2:1994cv06417
Petitioner:
William A Noguera
Respondent:
Jeanne Woodford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dawkins v. Woodford et al
as 3:2009cv01053
Defendant:
D Gonzalez, Jeanne Woodford, T Ochoa and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony D Dawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Pedro Hernandez v. Jeanne Woodford
as 11-16530
Petitioner - Appellant:
PEDRO HERNANDEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
JEANNE WOODFORD, Director CDC
Michael Victory v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 11-16187
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL VICTORY
Defendant - Appellee:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor, JEANNE WOODFORD, Director of Corrections, JAMES A. YATES, Warden and others
Richard Runquist v. Jeanne Woodford, et al
as 11-16101
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD G. RUNQUIST
Respondent - Appellee:
JEANNE WOODFORD, K. PROSPER, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Marlin Penn v. M. McDonald, et al
as 11-15884
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARLIN ASHLEY PENN
Defendant - Appellee:
M. D. MCDONALD, Warden, KEATING, Sgt. and JEANNE WOODFORD, Director
George Strong v. Jeanne Woodford, et al
as 11-55406
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE BERRY STRONG
Defendant - Appellee:
JEANNE WOODFORD, Director, in her individual capacity, MATTHEW MARTEL, Associate Warden, in his individual capacity, JOANN GORDON, Warden, in her individual capacity and others
Vincent Bruce v. Jeanne Woodford, et al
as 11-15195
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VINCENT C. BRUCE
Defendant - Appellee:
JEANNE WOODFORD, DERRAL G. ADAMS, LYDIA HENSE and others
Dennis Hezekiah v. John Marshall, et al
as 11-55011
Petitioner - Appellant:
DENNIS MENELIK HEZEKIAH
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN MARSHALL, Warden, California Men's Colony and JEANNE WOODFORD, Director, California Department of Corrections
Randy Williams v. Jeanne Woodford
as 11-55001
Petitioner - Appellant:
RANDY WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
JEANNE WOODFORD, Dir of Corr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
