Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Miller v. Wilcot et al
as 4:2023cv00864
Plaintiff:
Matthew W. Miller
Defendant:
Dan Wilcot, William K. Busch, Lynn A. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. Ruby Construction Co., Inc et al
as 1:2008cv03495
Plaintiff:
Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Chicago Regional Council Of Carpenters Welfare Fund, Chicago and Northeast Illinois District Council of Carpenters Apprentice and Trainee Program Fund and others
Defendant:
Ruby Construction Co., Inc and Red Stone Builders, Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al
as 1:2008cv02448
Plaintiff:
Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Richard A. Baggio, Roger A. Monaco and others
Defendant:
Burling Builders, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. Professional Development Incorporated
as 1:2007cv07141
Plaintiff:
Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, RIchard A Baggio, Roger A. Monaco and others
Defendant:
Professional Development Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. Seater Construction Co., Inc.
as 1:2007cv07120
Plaintiff:
Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Richard A. Baggio, Roger A. Monaco and others
Defendant:
Seater Construction Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. A.M. Mechanical, Inc.
as 1:2007cv07138
Plaintiff:
Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Richard A. Baggio, Roger A. Monaco and others
Defendant:
A.M. Mechanical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
