Cases 1 - 10 of 10
(PC) Mitchell v. CDCR, et al
as 2:2020cv00831
Plaintiff:
Mia Rose Mitchell and Mia Rosati
Defendant:
Joseph Bick, Ralph M. Diaz, Jeffrey Carrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. CDCR, et al
as 2:2020at00401
Plaintiff:
Mia Rose Mitchell and Mia Rosati
Defendant:
Joseph Bick, Ralph M. Diaz, Jeffrey Carrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Landreth v. Lehil et al
as 2:2020cv00472
Defendant:
Thao Nguyen, Jonovan Ottenbacher, Jeffrey Carrick and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Michael Landreth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lyralisa Stevens v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 19-15838
Defendant / Appellee:
GODWIN UGWUEZE, Chief Medical Executive at SATF, FELIX IGBINOSA, Regional Medical Executive, M.D., CHRISTOPHER PODRATZ, Region III Health Care Executive and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LYRALISA LAVENA STEVENS
(PC) Garcia v. Carrick
as 2:2019cv00643
Defendant:
Jeffrey Carrick
Plaintiff:
Manual Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Concepcion v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2018cv01743
Plaintiff:
Michelle Concepcion
Defendant:
Ralph Diaz, California Correctional Health Care Services, Clark J. Kelso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McQueen v. Brown et al
as 2:2018cv00766
Plaintiff:
Lamar McQueen
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Jeffrey Carrick, Medical Executive and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevens v. Beard et al
as 1:2017cv01002
Plaintiff:
Lyralisa Lavena Stevens
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard, Christopher Podratz, Godwin Ugwueze and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McQueen v. Lewis et al
as 2:2016cv02092
Plaintiff:
Lamar McQueen
Defendant:
J. Lewis, Jeffrey Beard, Jeffrey Carrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowen v. Cate et al
as 2:2012cv01519
Plaintiff:
Burch Michael Bowen
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, Phyllis Milliner, Jeffrey Carrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
