Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Johnathan Smith v. Lawrence Wang
as 09-7924
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHNATHAN LEE SMITH, a/k/a Johnathan L. X. Smith, a/k/a Johnathan Lee X Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
LAWRENCE WANG, M.D., A. GILES, Nurse, P. MCHALKO, Nurse and others
Smith v. Wang et al
as 7:2009cv00370
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Lee Smith
Defendant:
Lawrence Wang, A. Giles, P. McHalko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salinas v. Dillman
as 3:2009cv00510
Petitioner:
Nery Arnoldo Salinas
Respondent:
Jeffrey Dillman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Howerton v. Dillman et al
as 7:2009cv00237
Petitioner:
Lawrence Donal Howerton, Jr.
Defendant:
Jeffrey Dillman and Gene M. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Howerton v. Dillman et al
as 2:2009cv00284
Petitioner:
Lawrence Donal Howerton, Jr.
Defendant:
Jeffrey Dillman and Gene M. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hairston v. Dillman
as 7:2009cv00125
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Hairston
Respondent:
Jeffrey Dillman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Dillman et al
as 7:2009cv00097
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Lee Smith
Defendant:
Jeffrey Dillman, C. Mayes, Laurence Wang and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Latif Rashe'd v. Jeffrey Dillman
as 08-7129
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LATIF RASHE'D
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY DILLMAN, Warden Senior, K. L. PICKEREL, Assistant Warden and J. M. MILLNER, Department of Correctional Education
Henderson v. Dillman
as 7:2008cv00287
Plaintiff:
William Wade Henderson, III
Defendant:
Jeffrey Dillman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Salinas v. Dillman
as 7:2008cv00268
Plaintiff:
Nery A. Salinas
Defendant:
Jeffrey Dillman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
