Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Rackley v. Crow
as 5:2022cv00394
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Michael Rackley
Respondent:
Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. City of Tulsa, et al
as 15-5002
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMARCO DEON WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF TULSA and RON PALMER
Defendant:
JEFFREY MICHAEL HENDERSON
Henderson v. William
as 14-606
Petitioner:
JEFFREY MICHAEL HENDERSON
Respondent:
DEMARCO DEON WILLIAMS
Williams v. Henderson
as 14-5150
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DEMARCO DEON WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellant:
JEFFREY MICHAEL HENDERSON
Defendant:
CITY OF TULSA and RON PALMER
Eastom v. City of Tulsa, et al
as 14-5132
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DUSTIN ROBERT EASTOM
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF TULSA, a municipal corporation, JEFFREY MICHAEL HENDERSON, individually and in his official capacity, BRANDON J. MCFADDEN, individually and in his official capacity and others
Eastom v. City of Tulsa, et al
as 13-5127
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DUSTIN ROBERT EASTOM
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF TULSA, a municipal corporation, JEFFREY MICHAEL HENDERSON, individually and in his official capacity, BRANDON J. MCFADDEN, individually and in his official capacity and others
Reynolds v. Davis et al
as 1:2013cv00034
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Michael Reynolds
Respondent:
John Davis and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eastom v. City of Tulsa, The et al
as 4:2011cv00581
Plaintiff:
Dustin Robert Eastom
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, The, Jeffrey Michael Henderson, Brandon J McFadden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Tulsa, City of et al
as 4:2011cv00485
Plaintiff:
Demario Terrel Harris
Defendant:
Tulsa, City of , Jeffrey Michael Henderson and William Allen Yelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Tulsa, City of et al
as 4:2011cv00469
Plaintiff:
Demarco Deon Williams
Defendant:
Tulsa, City of and Jeffrey Michael Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
