Cases 1 - 10 of 16
WARREN et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2026cv01856
Plaintiff:
JIMMIE WARREN, KIMBERLY WARREN, AMBER WARREN and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Rush v. Eric Gerard Realty, LLC.
as 6:2026cv03208
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Rush
Defendant:
Eric Gerard Realty, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Rush v. Honest Pest Services LLC
as 4:2026cv02580
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Rush
Defendant:
Honest Pest Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Rush v. Journey Builders Inc.
as 6:2026cv03163
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Rush
Defendant:
Journey Builders Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Rush v. Selectquote Insurance Services Inc.
as 6:2026cv03157
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Rush
Defendant:
Selectquote Insurance Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Rush v. Manchac Roofing TX, LLC
as 4:2026cv01293
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Rush
Defendant:
Manchac Roofing TX, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Rush v. Arstrat, LLC.
as 6:2025cv03378
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Rush
Defendant:
Arstrat, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Rush v. Pulsar Publishing, LLC.
as 6:2025cv03369
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Rush
Defendant:
Pulsar Publishing, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Rush v. Leadpoint, Inc.
as 6:2025cv03331
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Rush
Defendant:
Leadpoint, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Rush v. Root Insurance Company
as 1:2025cv00775
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Rush
Defendant:
Root Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
