Cases 1 - 10 of 55
DAVIS v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
DIONTE JERMAINE DAVIS and CHRISTOPHER HORTEN
Defendant:
R QUINN, C HORTEN, K EMMIT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dionte Davis v. Tiffani Knox, et al
as 24-10473
Plaintiff:
DIONTE JERMAINE DAVIS
Defendant:
TIFFANI S. KNOX, C. RUSSELL, TYLER WATSON and others
Dionte Davis v. Tiffani Knox, et al
as 24-10203
Plaintiff:
DIONTE JERMAINE DAVIS
Defendant:
TIFFANI S. KNOX, C. RUSSELL, TYLER WATSON and others
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv22004
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE DAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv12630
Plaintiff:
TYRONE JERMAINE DAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Davis et al v. Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, et al
as 1:2023cv13462
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Davis and Teresa R. Davis
Defendant:
Revlon Consumer Products Corporation,, Revlon Group Holdings, LLC, Revlon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Davis v. Knox et al
as 3:2023cv00298
Plaintiff:
Dionte Jermaine Davis
Defendant:
Tiffani S. Knox, C. Russell, Tyler Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS et al v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 2:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE DAVIS and KATRINA DAVIS
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01410
Plaintiff:
JAFAITH JERMAINE DAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DAVIS v. DIXON et al
as 5:2022cv00308
Plaintiff:
TREVOR JERMAIN DAVIS
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, JOHN KOLODZIEJ, E L COOLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
