Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Keith DeOrio v. Betty Yee, et al
as 16-56337
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH R. DEORIO, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
BETTY T. YEE, President of the California Franchise Tax Board in her Official Capacity, JEROME E. HORTON, Board Member of the California Franchise Tax Board in his Official Capacity, MICHAEL COHEN, Board Member of the California Franchise Tax Board in his Official Capacity and others
Keith R DeOrio v. Betty Yee et al
as 2:2015cv04793
Defendant:
Anna Caballero, Anna Caballero, Michael Cohen and others
Plaintiff:
Keith R DeOrio
Gilbert Hyatt v. Betty Yee, et al
as 15-15296
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GILBERT P. HYATT
Defendant - Appellee:
BETTY T. YEE, in her official capacity as California Franchise Tax Board member and California State Board of Equalization member, DIANE L. HARKEY, in her official capacity as California State Board of Equalization member, JOHN CHIANG, in his official capacity as California Franchise Tax Board member and California State Board of Equalization member and others
Ernest Franceschi, Jr. v. John Chiang, et al
as 14-56493
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERNEST JOSEPH FRANCESCHI, Jr., Attorney, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN CHIANG, President of California Franchise Tax Board in his Official Capacity, JEROME E. HORTON, Board Member of California Franchise Tax Board in his Official Capacity, GEORGE VALVERDE, Director of California Department of Motor Vehicles in his Official Capacity and others
Hyatt v. Chiang et al
as 2:2014cv00849
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
John Chiang , Jerome E. Horton , Michael Cohen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ernest J. Franceschi v. John Chiang et al
as 2:2014cv01960
Defendant:
John Chiang, Michael Cohen, Jerome E. Horton and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest J. Franceschi, Jr.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00450
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
