Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Oklahoma City City of v. 100 Foot Wide Continuous Extended Term Easement and Other Related Pump Station Continuous Extended Term Easements and rights-of-way for public utility water pipelines et al
as 5:2020cv00023
Defendant:
Delores Ann Springer, John Charles Tiger, Nancie Lou Longacres Warrior and others
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma City City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Skipton et al v. RevHoney. Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02682
Plaintiff:
RevHoney Texas, LLC and Donald E. Skipton
Defendant:
RevHoney, Inc., Jerry A. Brown and Debra D. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. City of Bel Aire, Kansas, et al
as 13-3045
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY D. BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF BEL AIRE, KANSAS, MATTHEW T. MCGUIRE and JOHN R. DAILY
Brown v. Bel Aire, Kansas, City of et al
as 6:2011cv01307
Plaintiff:
Jerry D. Brown
Defendant:
Bel Aire, Kansas, City of, Matthew T. McGuire and John R. Daily
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-1248
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jerry Brown v. Walter Dinwiddie
as 07-5182
Petitioner - Appellant:
JERRY LEWIS BROWN
Respondent - Appellee:
WALTER DINWIDDIE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 no Job Discrimination (National Origin)
Brown v. Dinwiddie
as 4:2007cv00111
Petitioner:
Jerry Lewis Brown
Respondent:
Walter Dinwiddie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Browning et al v. DaimlerChrysler Corporation
as 2:2007cv00011
Plaintiff:
Jerry Ron Browning, Jerry Ron Browning, Jerry Ron Browning and others
Defendant:
DaimlerChrysler Corporation, DaimlerChrysler Corporation, DaimlerChrysler Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
