Cases 1 - 10 of 522
Guidry v. LA Dept of Public Safety
as 24-30754
Defendant:
Jerry Goodwin and Louisiana Department of Public Safety
Plaintiff:
Logan Guidry and Kenneth Cotton, III
Lucas v. Baird et al
as 5:2024cv00804
Defendant:
Judwell, Millage, Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Lee Lucas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Goodwin
as 23-30631
Petitioner / Appellant:
Benjamin Lee Reed
Respondent / Appellee:
Jerry Goodwin, Warden, David Wade Correctional Center
Augustine v. LeBlanc et al
as 5:2023cv01131
Plaintiff:
Joseph Augustine
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, Michele Dauzat, Jerry Goodwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKnight v. Goodwin
as 23-30178
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Orlando McKnight
Defendant / Appellee:
Jerry Goodwin, Warden, David Wade Correctional Center, Individually and in His Official Capacity, Johnie Adkins, Individually and in His Official Capacity, Bruce Young, Major, Individually and in His Official Capacity and others
Domino v. Goodwin et al
as 5:2023cv00492
Plaintiff:
Brandon R Domino
Defendant:
Jerry Goodwin, Jake Baird and James LeBlanc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. Norris et al
as 5:2023cv00084
Defendant:
John Doe, Michelle Norris, Jon Bell Edwards and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Ray Pittman, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Goodwin
as 5:2023cv00105
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Lee Reed
Defendant:
Jerry Goodwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Goodwin
as 23-30020
Petitioner / Appellant:
Arthur Ray Robinson
Respondent / Appellee:
Jerry Goodwin, Warden, David Wade Correctional Center
Robinson v. Goodwin
as 5:2022cv06062
Plaintiff:
Steven D Robinson
Defendant:
Jerry Goodwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
