Cases 41 - 50 of 87
Maske v. Aurora Animal Care et al
as 1:2009cv02753
Petitioner:
Jerry L. Maske
Respondent:
Aurora Animal Care and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maske v. Murphy et al
as 1:2009cv02752
Petitioner:
Jerry L. Maske
Respondent:
Robert Murphy and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maske v. Aurora Animal Care
as 1:2009cv02751
Petitioner:
Jerry L. Maske
Respondent:
Aurora Animal Care and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maske v. Chappell, et al
as 09-1438
Petitioner - Appellant:
JERRY L. MASKE
Respondent - Appellee:
MARY CHAPPELL and COLORADO ATTORNEY GENERAL
Maske v. Estrada, et al
as 09-1439
Petitioner - Appellant:
JERRY L. MASKE
Respondent - Appellee:
VALERIE ESTRADA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Maske v. Murphy, et al
as 09-1440
Petitioner - Appellant:
JERRY L. MASKE
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT MURPHY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Maske v. Estrada, et al
as 09-1441
Petitioner - Appellant:
JERRY L. MASKE
Respondent - Appellee:
VALERIE ESTRADA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Maske v. City of Aurora et al
as 1:2009cv02342
Plaintiff:
Jerry L. Maske
Defendant:
City of Aurora, Aurora Police Department, Aurora Probation Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maske v. Arapahoe County et al
as 1:2009cv02341
Plaintiff:
Jerry L. Maske
Defendant:
Arapahoe County, Arapahoe County Probation Department and Robert Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maske v. City and County of Denver et al
as 1:2009cv02340
Plaintiff:
Jerry L. Maske
Defendant:
City and County of Denver and Janis Ferrara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
