Cases filed in Pennsylvania
MADISON v. WALSH et al
as 2:2013cv07012
Petitioner: ALFONZO EDWARD MADISON
Respondent: JERRY WALSH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bennett v. Walsh We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv02286
Petitioner: Edward Bennett
Respondent: Jerry Walsh and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BILAL v. WALSH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv01973
Petitioner: NAFIS BILAL
Respondent: JERRY WALSH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boyle v. Ransom et al
as 3:2010cv00180
Plaintiff: Juston Bayard Boyle
Defendant: Ransom, R. J. Bath, J. Matello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EVERETT v. WALSH et al
as 2:2009cv05691
Petitioner: JAMES EVERETT, III
Respondent: JERRY WALSH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELHIA, LYNNE ABRAHAM and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, MR. THOMAS CORBETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boyle v. Klopotoski et al
as 3:2009cv01158
Plaintiff: Juston Boyle
Defendant: Michael Klopotoski, Jerry Walsh, Vincent Mooney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heath v. Beard et al
as 1:2008cv00933
Plaintiff: Paul John Heath
Defendant: Jeffrey A. Beard, Chief Examiner, Michael Klopotoski and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CARROLL v. PENNSYLVANIA SCI WAYMART et al
as 2:2008cv00330
Plaintiff: WESLEY CARROLL
Defendant: PENNSYLVANIA SCI WAYMART, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?