Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Blair v. Stone County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Harleen Blair
Defendant:
Stone County, Mississippi, Mike Farmer, Philip L. Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Caston v. City of Magnolia, Mississippi et al
as 5:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
Jesse Caston
Defendant:
City of Magnolia, Mississippi, Tammy Witherspoon and Sonya Woodall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Jones et al v. Jones County, MS et al
as 2:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
Corbey Jones and Cynthia Ann Jones
Defendant:
Jones County, MS, Sheriff Joe Berlin, Deputy James Mann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Malone v. Cooke Insurance Center, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00035
Plaintiff:
Carl Malone
Defendant:
Cooke Insurance Center, Inc., Thomas A. Wooten, Christy Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Tasciotti v. Trew et al
as 1:2021cv00209
Defendant:
Glen Trew and Jesse Trew
Plaintiff:
Peter Tasciotti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00111
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00127
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00564
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Mississippi Department of Child Protective Services et al
as 4:2018cv00165
Defendant:
Captain Garrett Hartley, Mississippi Department of Child Protective Services, Misty McCammon and others
Plaintiff:
Mattie L. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
