Cases 1 - 10 of 10
MARTINEZ v. USA
as 1:2023cv01928
Plaintiff:
JESSE MARTINEZ, JR.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
USA v. Martinez
as 22-10958
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jesse Martinez, Jr., also known as J.J.
Buechler et al v. Rumble, Inc.
as 8:2022cv02237
Plaintiff:
James Buechler and Jesse Martinez
Defendant:
Rumble, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Kent R.E. Whitney et al
as 8:2019cv00499
Defendant:
Kent R.E. Whitney, CHS Asset Management, Inc., The Church For The Healthy Self a/k/a CHS Trust and others
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Not Yet Classified:
Robert P Mosier
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
United States v. Enrique Trevino
as 15-1534
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Enrique Roberto Trevino, also known as Jesse Martinez, also known as Robert Ringo, also known as Enrique Moreno, also known as Ricky Trevino
Dirks et al v. Los Angeles Community College District et al
as 2:2007cv02664
Defendant:
Lee Baca, Rickey Baker, Barker and others
Unknown:
Adrianna C Paige, Adrianna C Paige, Adrianna C Paige and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Dirks, Yesenia Franco, Lorena Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Jesus Martinez
as 10-20843
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JESUS EUGENIO PINEDA MARTINEZ, also known as Jessie Martinez, also known as Jesse Martinez, also known as Jose Angel Mendoza
Leota Frank et al v. Daima Calhoun et al
as 2:2010cv00643
Defendant:
Adult Protective Services, Daima Calhoun, Kim Emmerling and others
Plaintiff:
Leota Ann Frank
Martinez v. Financial Credit Services, Inc.
as 1:2009cv00320
Plaintiff:
Jesse Martinez
Defendant:
Financial Credit Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
