Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Sanchez la Torre, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2106
Petitioner:
MIGUEL ANGEL SANCHEZ LA TORRE, YAQUELINE KRISTIMEN LIZA ALVAREZ, SABRINA AKIRA YACKELIN SANCHEZ LIZA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv62274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv62271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
USA v. Munoz-Betancourt
as 23-50462
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Manuel Munoz-Betancourt, also known as Manuel Munoz-Betancur, also known as Jesus Sanchez-Alvarez
Mario Zeron, et al v. Mark Parello
as 20-11447
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARIO ZERON, LUIS MACHADO, JUAN RAMON DIAZ MEMBRENO and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Defendant / Appellant:
MARK J. PARELLO, individually
Youngblood v. Pena
as 19-4096
Defendant:
Corrections Officer T.J., Shield #19297, all being sued in their official and personal capacity, City of New York and Corrections Officer T.I., Shield #19297
Defendant / Appellee:
Detective Louis Pena, 886273 and Officer Jesus Sanchez, #5644
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Andre Youngblood
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv02437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Carlos Sanchez-Zabaleta v. William Barr
as 19-73136
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Petitioner:
CARLOS DE JESUS SANCHEZ-ZABALETA
USA v. Antonio De Jesus Sanchez-Muril
as 19-10429
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTONIO DE JESUS SANCHEZ-MURILLO
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States v. Sanchez
as 19-3203
Defendant / Appellant:
JESUS SANCHEZ
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
