Cases
Rufus Spearman v. Daniel Heyns, et al
as 17-1384
Plaintiff - Appellant: RUFUS SPEARMAN, aka Rufus Lamar Savin Spearman
Defendant - Appellee: DANIEL H. HEYNS, Director of the MDOC, RICHARD D. RUSSELL, Grievance Manager & Misconduct Hearings Administrator, UNKNOWN PART(Y)(IES), named as Kinross Complex Store, Jane Doe (Prisoner Store Employees) and others
Rufus Spearman v. Daniel Heyns, et al
as 17-1338
Plaintiff - Appellant: RUFUS SPEARMAN, aka Rufus Lamar Savin Spearman
Defendant - Appellee: DANIEL H. HEYNS, Director of the MDOC, RICHARD D. RUSSELL, Grievance Manager & Misconduct Hearings Administrator, UNKNOWN PART(Y)(IES), named as Kinross Complex Store, Jane Doe (Prisoner Store Employees) and others
Charles Fields v. Dan Lesatz, et al
as 16-2711
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHARLES EDWARD FIELDS
Defendant - Appellee: DAN LESATZ, Deputy Warden, SCOTT SPRADER, Deputy Warden, L. PHILLIPSON, Arus and others
Defendant: CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden, ROBIN GILBERT and BRADLEY HAYNIE
Good v. Heyns et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv12064
Plaintiff: Jonathan Good
Defendant: Dennis Heyns, Steve Rivard, Peet and others
Spearman #320836 v. Heyns et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00015
Plaintiff: Rufus L. Spearman #320836
Defendant: Daniel H. Heyns, Richard D. Russell, Unknown Part(y)(ies) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields #261409 v. Lesatz et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00067
Plaintiff: Charles Edward Fields #261409
Defendant: Dan Lesatz, Scott Sprader, Catherine Bauman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mobley #257694 v. Gerth et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv00227
Plaintiff: Junell Mobley #257694
Defendant: Denise Gerth, Lyle Rutter, Unknown Tenuta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?