Cases 1 - 10 of 94
Kuzmenko v. Phillips, et al.
as 25-3145
Petitioner:
VERA KUZMENKO
Respondent:
ARINDA PHILLIPS and JIM COOPER
Martin v. Phillips, et al.
as 25-3149
Petitioner:
DUMITRU MARTIN
Respondent:
ARINDA PHILLIPS and JIM COOPER
Eke v. Cooper
as 2:2025at00473
Plaintiff:
Chidi Joachim Eke
Defendant:
Jim Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Eke v. Cooper
as 2:2025cv01089
Plaintiff:
Chidi Joachim Eke
Defendant:
Jim Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Bonta, et al.
as 25-2341
Plaintiff:
KENNETH HILL
Defendant:
ROB BONTA, Attorney General State of California, JIM COOPER, Sacramento County Sheriff Chief, PHIL SERMA, Sacramento County Board of Supervisors-Chair and others
(HC) Martin v. Phillips et al
as 2:2025at00264
Petitioner:
Dumitru Martin
Defendant:
Arinda Phillips and Jim Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(HC) Martin v. Phillips et al
as 2:2025cv00687
Petitioner:
Dumitru Martin
Defendant:
Arinda Phillips and Jim Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(HC) Kuzmenko v. Phillips et al
as 2:2025cv00663
Petitioner:
Vera Kuzmenko
Respondent:
Arinda Phillips and Jim Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Estate of David Barefield Sr. et al v. City of Sacramento et al
as 2:2024cv03427
Plaintiff:
Estate of David Barefield Sr., Finas Barefield, David Barefield, II and others
Defendant:
James Eddins, Sacramento County Sheriff's Department, Katherine Lester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Footman v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2024cv03203
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, Fernando Saenz, Sacramento County Emergency and Medical Services and others
Plaintiff:
Kaylin Footman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
