Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Selene Finance, LP v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2023cv01124
Plaintiff:
Selene Finance, LP
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, Jim Cooper and Malcolm & Cisneros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
(PC) Mathews v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2023cv01021
Plaintiff:
James Lee Mathews
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, Jim Cooper, Yee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Mabon v. Cooper
as 2:2023cv01004
Petitioner:
Lejon Mabon
Respondent:
Jim Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Jones v. Cooper
as 2:2023cv00817
Plaintiff:
Philip John Jones
Defendant:
Jim Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Latifi v. Cooper et al
as 2:2023cv00665
Plaintiff:
Kareem Latifi
Defendant:
Jim Cooper, Sacramento County and R.C.C.C
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Singh v. Cooper et al
as 2:2023cv00660
Plaintiff:
Gurpreet Singh
Defendant:
Jim Cooper and Aaron Leahy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Kern v. Cooper et al
as 2:2023cv00618
Plaintiff:
James Kern
Defendant:
Jim Cooper, A. Leahy, Tamira Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Fickenworth v. Cooper et al
as 2:2023cv00412
Plaintiff:
Garrison Fickenworth
Defendant:
Jim Cooper, JPS Coordinator and JPS Phychiatrist
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PS)Rogers v. Bonta et al
as 2:2022cv01157
Plaintiff:
Kim Edward Rogers
Defendant:
Rob Bonta, Jim Cooper and Guadalupe Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Windom v. Brady et al
as 5:2019cv02045
Defendant:
Mitch McConnell, Alan C. Nelson, Dick Cheney and others
Plaintiff:
I & O Publishing Co., Neo-Tech Research Writing Center and Cameron O. Windom
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
