Cases 41 - 50 of 507
Gibbs v. Ladner et al
as 4:2018cv00183
Respondent:
Jim Hood and Warden Ladner
Petitioner:
Henry Gibbs, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gibbs v. Ladner et al
as 3:2018cv00530
Respondent:
Jim Hood and Warden Ladner
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Petitioner:
Henry Gibbs, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas et al v. Bryant et al
as 3:2018cv00441
Defendant:
Jim Hood, Delbert Hosemann and Phil Bryant
Plaintiff:
Vernon Ayers, Joseph Thomas and Melvin Lawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Adams v. Bryant et al
as 1:2018cv00110
Petitioner:
David Adams
Respondent:
Phil Bryant and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
State of Mississippi, ex rel. Jim Hood v. Prime Insurance Company
as 3:2018cv00320
Plaintiff:
State of Mississippi, ex rel. Jim Hood
Defendant:
Prime Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The State of Mississippi, Ex Rel., Jim Hood, Attorney General et al v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
as 3:2018cv00315
Plaintiff:
The State of Mississippi, Ex Rel., Jim Hood, Attorney General and Stacey E. Pickering
Defendant:
Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gray v. Bryant et al
as 1:2018cv00152
Plaintiff:
David Gray
Defendant:
Phil Bryant, Jim Hood, Brian Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State of Mississippi ex rel. Jim Hood v. Global Client Solutions, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv00280
Plaintiff:
State of Mississippi ex rel. Jim Hood
Defendant:
Global Client Solutions, LLC , Global Holdings, LLC , US Legal Services Group, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Purnell v. Trump et al
as 4:2018cv00099
Petitioner:
Leroy Purnell
Respondent:
Donald Trump, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Federal Bureau and Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Maxwell v. Banks et al
as 5:2018cv00026
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Maxwell
Defendant:
Jacquelyn Banks and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
