Cases 51 - 60 of 123
Seese v. Montana State Prison et al
as 9:2022cv00137
Plaintiff:
Stephen W. Seese
Defendant:
Montana State Prison, Jim Salmonsen, Paul Rees and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NezPerce v. Salmonsen
as 2:2022cv00057
Petitioner:
Joseph Denny NezPerce
Respondent:
Jim Salmonsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whitford v. Salmonsen et al
as 6:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Makueeyapee D. Whitford
Defendant:
Jim Salmonsen and C. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eva v. Montana State Prison et al
as 6:2022cv00057
Plaintiff:
Raymond Joseph Eva
Defendant:
Montana State Prison and Jim Salmonsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Salmonsen et al
as 6:2022cv00056
Plaintiff:
Anthony Evans
Defendant:
Jim Salmonsen and Christine Klanecky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seese v. Salmonsen et al
as 9:2022cv00118
Petitioner:
Stephen W. Seese
Respondent:
Jim Salmonsen and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Franks v. Salmonsen et al
as 9:2022cv00116
Petitioner:
Jason Franks
Respondent:
Jim Salmonsen and Austin Knudsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Makueeyapee Whitford v. Reginald Michael, et al
as 22-35526
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAKUEEYAPEE D. WHITFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
REGINALD D. MICHAEL, CYNTHIA WOLKEN, JIM SALMONSEN and others
Medina v. Graham et al
as 6:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Medina
Defendant:
Arron Graham, Jim Salmonsen, Thomas Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hershey v. Salmonsen et al
as 6:2022cv00039
Plaintiff:
James Hershey
Defendant:
Jim Salmonsen, Amber Graham, Sally Odden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
