Cases 21 - 30 of 153
Boldt v. Salmonsen et al
as 1:2023cv00124
Petitioner:
Anthony Dwayne Boldt
Respondent:
Jim Salmonsen and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Zindell v. Salmonsen
as 4:2023cv00063
Petitioner:
Gregg Allen Zindell
Respondent:
Jim Salmonsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chesterman v. Salmonsen et al
as 1:2023cv00117
Petitioner:
Timothy Lloyd Chesterman
Respondent:
Jim Salmonsen and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keefe v. Salmonsen et al
as 9:2023cv00100
Petitioner:
Jordan Keefe
Respondent:
Jim Salmonsen and Austin Knudsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ironman-Whitecow v. Salmonsen et al
as 4:2023cv00053
Petitioner:
Buggz Ironman-Whitecow and Kim Allen Norquay, Jr.
Respondent:
Jim Salmonsen and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lindberg v. Salmonsen
as 9:2023cv00095
Petitioner:
Larry Rolan Lindberg
Respondent:
Jim Salmonsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Godfrey v. Salmonsen
as 23-1979
Not Yet Classified:
MT MSP LIBRARIAN
Petitioner:
TRACEY R. GODFREY
Respondent:
JIM SALMONSEN
Keefe v. Salmonsen et al
as 6:2023cv00056
Petitioner:
Jordan Keefe
Respondent:
Jim Salmonsen and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Christopher v. Salmonsen et al
as 9:2023cv00086
Petitioner:
Logan Dallas Christopher
Respondent:
Jim Salmonsen and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pasquinzo v. Salmonsen
as 23-1570
Not Yet Classified:
MT MSP LIBRARIAN
Petitioner:
DOUGLAS P. PASQUINZO
Respondent:
JIM SALMONSEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
