Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Roberson et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 4:2013cv03811
Plaintiff:
Leon Roberson , Edith Doberstein , Irving Epstein and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company , Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC , Sanofi-Aventis U.S., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Koivisto v. Walker et al
as 2:2012cv00772
Plaintiff:
Tauno A Koivisto, III
Defendant:
Jimmy Walker, Sahota, Laura Bebe and others
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 437
Jordan v. Walker
as 4:2010cv04726
Petitioner:
Harol Lam Jordan
Respondent:
Jimmy Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hill v. Walker et al
as 2:2010cv00803
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Lee Hill
Defendant:
Jimmy Walker, Rapoport, J. Bal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronnie C. Brown v. Jimmy Walker
as 2:2008cv08405
Petitioner:
Ronnie C Brown
Respondent:
Jimmy Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Funtanilla v. Kelly, et al
as 2:2002cv01157
Defendant:
Michael Jaffe , Richard Lipon , Russell Ewing and others
Plaintiff:
Gregorio C. Funtanilla, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tholmer v. Pliler, et al
as 2:2004cv01368
Plaintiff:
Lionell Ernest Tholmer
Defendant:
Cheryl Pliler , T Rosario , G Stratton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard Arvizo Zenteno v. Jimmy Walker
as 5:2009cv01175
Petitioner:
Ricardo Arvizo Zenteno
Respondent:
Jimmy Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Williams v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2008cv02860
Plaintiff:
Patrick Williams
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, N. Grannis, D.C. Kenndy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Walker et al
as 2:2008cv02844
Plaintiff:
Michael J Hicks
Defendant:
Jimmie Walker, Linda Young, Michael Jaffe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
