Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Johnson v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv04376
Plaintiff:
Joe Johnson
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Ard v. Kijakazi(CONSENT)
as 1:2022cv00079
Plaintiff:
Joe Ard
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Crenshaw v. Kijakazi
as 1:2021cv00549
Plaintiff:
Joe Crenshaw
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
BOYD v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2021cv00057
Not Classified By Court:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NOTICE)
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JOE BOYD and JOANN BOYD PITTS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Gibson v. Saul
as 3:2021cv00027
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Ruby Joe Gibson
Not Classified By Court:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Montoya v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2021cv00176
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Joe Montoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Reed v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2020cv01214
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Joe R Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hitchcock v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 5:2019cv01573
Plaintiff:
Tommy Joe Hitchcock
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Pedrero v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2019cv00297
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Joe Pedrero and Joe Pedrero, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Robinson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2018cv02221
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Billy Joe Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
