Cases 41 - 50 of 78
Baxter v. Schmidt
as 3:2013cv00100
Petitioner:
Marten Baxter
Respondent:
Joe Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williamson v. Turnbull et al
as 3:2013cv00032
Plaintiff:
Thor J. Williamson
Defendant:
Craig Turnbull, Booth, Joe D. Driver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abear v. Hibpshman et al
as 3:2013cv00027
Plaintiff:
Jill Abear
Defendant:
Robert Hibpshman and Joe Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crowley v. Schmidt et al
as 3:2013cv00021
Plaintiff:
Robert Crowley
Defendant:
Joe Schmidt, Sherry Daigle, Boothe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Lyden et al
as 3:2013cv00009
Plaintiff:
Tommy Smith
Defendant:
Timothy Lyden, Luna, Samburg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nuglene v. Brooks et al
as 3:2012cv00251
Plaintiff:
Charles Eric Nuglene
Defendant:
Laura Brooks, Debbie Miller, Hopper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Lyden et al
as 3:2012cv00243
Plaintiff:
Jesse Johnson
Defendant:
Timothy Lyden, Joe D. Driver and Tami Anding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pedersen v. Schmidt
as 3:2012cv00237
Plaintiff:
Siegfried Pedersen
Defendant:
Joe Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peregrine Falcon Alaska, LLC v. Northern Telecommunications Consultants, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00208
Plaintiff:
Peregrine Falcon Alaska, LLC
Defendant:
Northern Telecommunications Consultants, Inc. and Joe R. Loffredo
Counter_claimant:
Joe R. Loffredo and Northern Telecommunications Consultants, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Peregrine Falcon Alaska, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Lockuk v. Commissioner of Alaska D.O.C. et al
as 3:2012cv00163
Petitioner:
Jesse Patrick Lockuk
Respondent:
Commissioner of Alaska D.O.C. and Joe Driver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
