Cases 11 - 20 of 617
Hakimyar et al v. Habib Bank Limited
as 1:2024cv00993
Plaintiff:
Karim Hakimyar, Zara Karim, S.K. and others
Defendant:
Habib Bank Limited
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
Joe v. FDNY et al
as 1:2024cv00948
Plaintiff:
Willie L. Joe
Defendant:
FDNY, City of New York, Kevin Simpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Casby v. Jackson et al
as 1:2023cv11295
Plaintiff:
Cyrus Casby and Original Mann
Defendant:
Curtis Jackson, Cardi B, Fat Joe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv10744
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions
DeMaria v. Univision Communications Inc.
as 1:2023cv10064
Plaintiff:
Joe DeMaria
Defendant:
Univision Communications Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Jean-Louis v. Coast Guard et al
as 1:2023cv09830
Plaintiff:
Mr. Joe W. Jean-Louis and Lt. Colonel, John Holt U.S. Army Special Forces
Defendant:
Coast Guard, New York City Mayor N.Y.C. and Police Bomb Squad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Needleman v. McFadden et al
as 1:2023cv09699
Plaintiff:
Jerry S. Needleman
Defendant:
Michael McFadden, Joe Carsio and Sylvia Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fr Fed. Question: Fraud
Burns v. Clinton
as 1:2023cv09621
Petitioner:
Trevor Burns
Respondent:
Joe Clinton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Naclerio v. DocGo Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv09476
Plaintiff:
Joe Naclerio
Defendant:
DocGo Inc., Stan Vashovsky, Anthony Capone and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
