Cases 11 - 20 of 103
M. et al v. Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield et al
as 2:2022cv00115
Plaintiff:
Joe M. and Christi M.
Defendant:
Anthem Blue Access PPO and Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
M. et al v. Geometry Global et al
as 2:2022cv00114
Plaintiff:
Joe M. and Christi M.
Defendant:
Geometry Global, WPP Group USA and WPP Group USA Inc Benefits Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Viens v. Nowicki et al
as 2:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
Gary C. Viens and Gary Clayton Viens
Defendant:
FNU Nowicki, FNU Crockett, Joe LNU and others
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Roundy
as 2:2021cv00486
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Joe Roundy
Brunson v. Adams et al
as 1:2021cv00111
Plaintiff:
Raland J. Brunson
Defendant:
Alma S. Adams, Pete Aguilar, Colin Z. Allred and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Stang v. USA
as 2:2021cv00345
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Joe Dee Stang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Reyes v. Fowlkes et al
as 1:2021cv00061
Defendant:
Utah Department of Natural Resources Parks and Recreation, Mike Fowlks, Mercer Owen and others
Plaintiff:
Freddy Joe Reyes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Western Architectural Services et al
as 2:2021cv00205
Plaintiff:
Billy Joe Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
Tracy Jones, Western Architectural Services and Scott Jones
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Peck v. New Hampshire, State of et al
as 2:2020cv00861
Defendant:
Kamala Harris, Joe Biden and New Hampshire, State of
Plaintiff:
Gregory Louis Peck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robbins v. Resident Verify
as 2:2020cv00578
Defendant:
Resident Verify
Plaintiff:
Michael Joe Robbins
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
