Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Knapp v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2017cv01509
Plaintiff:
Jonathan L Knapp
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Paul Penzone, Joe Arpaio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stoller v. Bank of New York Mellon Trust Co et al
as 4:2011cv04102
Plaintiff:
Christopher Stoller
Defendant:
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Co, Robert P Kelly, Gerald L Hassell and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Rawls v. Maricopa County, et al
as 2:2010cv00231
Plaintiff:
Vernon Rawls
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of , Joe Arpaio , Unknown Murillo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jerrod Booth v. Joe Arpaio, et al
as 09-16210
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERROD LENN B.B. ARPAIO and JERROD LEN B.B. BOOTH
Defendant - Appellee:
JOE ARPAIO, JAMES GARRITSON, I.L.S. DEPT., All Members and others
Benny Berryman v. Joe Arpaio
as 09-16068
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BENNY DAN BERRYMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JOE ARPAIO, Sheriff
Bohnert v. Mitchell, et al
as 2:2008cv02303
Plaintiff:
Curtis Bohnert
Defendant:
J. Mitchell, George A Burke, Kevin Carr and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Booth v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2008cv01764
Plaintiff:
Jerrod Len B. B. Booth
Defendant:
Joe Arpaio, James Garstson, I.L.S. Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Martinez v. Maricopa County, et al
as 2:2008cv01614
Plaintiff:
Jesus Alberto Martinez and Jesus Alberto Martinez
Defendant:
Maricopa County, Joe Arpaio, Jane Doe Arpaio and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Berryman v. United States Marshal et al
as 2:2008cv00667
Plaintiff:
Benny Dan Berryman
Defendant:
United States Marshal, Bill Doe and Joe Arpaio
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Giunta, et al v. City of Phoenix et al
as 2:2007cv01647
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of, Phoenix, City of, Jack F Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Giunta and Agnes Lea Giunta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
