Cases 1 - 10 of 11
GRAHAM v. BIDEN et al
as 5:2024cv00426
Petitioner:
Jonathan Graham
Respondent:
Joe Biden, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Morrison v. Biden
as 5:2024cv00274
Petitioner:
Phillip Morrison
Respondent:
Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (state)
Morgan v. Biden et al
as 5:2024cv00002
Petitioner:
David Brian Morgan
Respondent:
Joe Biden, United States, Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
ABUAN v. BIDEN et al
as 5:2024cv00003
Petitioner:
Robert Abuan
Respondent:
Joe Biden, United States and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
King v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2023cv01141
Plaintiff:
Carey M King, Tearra King, Deoyon Janae Moore and others
Defendant:
Charles King, Cannady Paries, Deoyonte Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Biden
as 5:2023cv01109
Petitioner:
David Brian Morgan
Respondent:
Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Morgan v. Biden
as 5:2023cv01097
Petitioner:
David Brian Morgan
Respondent:
Joe Biden and David Rogers
Wade v. United States of America et al
as 4:2023cv00385
Plaintiff:
Ronald G Wade, Jr
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Oklahoma, City of Tulsa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wade v. United States of America et al
as 4:2022cv00209
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gene Wade, Jr
Defendant:
United Sates of America, State of Oklahoma, City of Tulsa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Johnson v. Walgreens et al
as 6:2022cv00087
Plaintiff:
Clarence D. Johnson and Nehemiah H&G Construction
Defendant:
Walgreens, CVS, Rite-Aid and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
