Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Gary Simpkins v. Boyd County, KY Fiscal Court, et al
as 21-5477
Defendant:
UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS, Individually and in Their Official Capacities
Defendant / Appellee:
STEPHEN TOWLER, In his Official Capacity as Boyd County Judge Executive, THOMAS JACKSON, In his Official Capacity as Boyd County Judge Executive, CARL TOLLIVER, In his Official Capacity as Boyd County Fiscal Court Commisioner and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARY SIMPKINS
Simpkins v. Boyd County Fiscal Court et al
as 0:2019cv00098
Plaintiff:
Gary Simpkins
Defendant:
Thomas Jackson, John Greer, Stephen Towler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Anderson v. Worthington et al
as 0:2018cv00115
Defendant:
S. Palmer, Shannon Worthington, Joe Burchett and others
Plaintiff:
Arnold Ray Anderson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burnett v. Boyd County Detention Center
as 0:2017cv00045
Plaintiff:
L.D. Burnett
Defendant:
Boyd County Detention Center, Tom Johnson, Kristen Gillium and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
West v. Burchett et al
as 0:2017cv00008
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Scott West
Defendant:
Joe Burchett , Thomas Jurta , Gregory Spears and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gabriel Adkins v. Joe Burchett, et al
as 15-6218
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GABRIEL I. ADKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOE BURCHETT, DAVE JUSTICE, MARK HARDY and others
Adams v. Burchett
as 0:2015cv00077
Plaintiff:
Justin Adams
Defendant:
Joe Burchett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adkins v. Burchett et al
as 0:2015cv00075
Plaintiff:
Gabriel I. Adkins
Defendant:
Joe Burchett, Dave Justice, Mark Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Burchett
as 3:2015cv00691
Plaintiff:
Justin Adams
Defendant:
Joe Burchett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robbins v. Burchett et al
as 0:2013cv00121
Plaintiff:
Donald David Robbins
Defendant:
Joe Burchett, Damon Mathews, Messer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
