Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Chapman v. Allen et al
as 1:2023cv01146
Plaintiff:
Billie Joe Chapman
Defendant:
Donald Allen, S Floyd, Earls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Billie Chapman, et al v. Tony Parker, et al
as 23-5534
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BILLIE JOE CHAPMAN
Plaintiff:
IAN J. CAMERON
Defendant / Appellee:
TONY PARKER, VINCENT VANTELL, Acting Warden, LIEUTENANT JACKSON and others
Billie Chapman, et al v. Tony Parker, et al
as 23-5279
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BILLIE JOE CHAPMAN and IAN J. CAMERON
Defendant / Appellee:
TONY PARKER, VINCENT VANTELL, Acting Warden, LIEUTENANT JACKSON and others
Chapman et al v. Parker et al
as 1:2022cv01229
Plaintiff:
Billie Joe Chapman and Ian J. Cameron
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Acting Warden Vincent Vantell, Lt. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. CHAPMAN
as 3:2022cv00023
Plaintiff:
PAUL LEWIS ROBINSON
Defendant:
SHERIFF JOE CHAPMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRANKLIN v. NOWLIN et al
as 3:2021cv00039
Plaintiff:
WADE ALLEN FRANKLIN
Defendant:
DR NOWLIN, SHERIFF JOE CHAPMAN, DR MWANGI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. CHAPMAN et al
as 3:2021cv00006
Defendant:
CHIEF KEITH BROOKS, MAJOR WADE HARRIS and SHERIFF JOE CHAPMAN
Plaintiff:
TRACY EDWARD JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. CHAPMAN et al
as 3:2020cv00088
Defendant:
J RICKS, JOE CHAPMAN, COREY WARD and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ESTEN WILLIAMS, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaither v. Chapman et al
as 3:2020cv00214
Defendant:
Dean Thrasher, Joe Chapman and Shame Meeks
Plaintiff:
Russell Gaither
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GAITHER v. CHAPMAN et al
as 3:2020cv00020
Defendant:
SGT SHANE MEEKS, CAPTAIN DEAN THRASHER and SHERIFF JOE CHAPMAN
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL GAITHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
