Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Spring Street Property, LLC et al v. General Star Indemnity Company
as 4:2021cv01147
Defendant:
General Star Indemnity Company
Plaintiff:
Joe Harris and Spring Street Property, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. Stephens
as 4:2016cv00266
Petitioner:
Billy Joe Harris
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harris v. Stephens
as 6:2015cv00242
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Billy Joe Harris
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Stephens
as 6:2015cv00034
Petitioner:
Billy Joe Harris
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harris v. Stephens
as 6:2015cv00002
Petitioner:
Billy Joe Harris
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Saldana v. Williams et al
as 5:2012cv00241
Plaintiff:
Federico Flores Saldana, Jr
Defendant:
E. C. Williams, Wade T Alexander, Jason Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv03880
Plaintiff:
Barry Joe Harris
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harris v. Clark
as 1:2009cv00228
Plaintiff:
Billy Joe Harris
Defendant:
Stanley E. Clark
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Miracle Appearance Reconditioning Specialists International Inc v. Harris et al
as 4:2007cv00524
Plaintiff:
Miracle Appearance Reconditioning Specialists International Inc, Miracle Appearance Reconditioning Specialists International Inc and Miracle Appearance Reconditioning Specialists International Inc
Defendant:
Scott nmn Harris, Valerie nmn Harris, Nathan Earl Chisolm and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
