Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Hunsinger v. Harris & Harris, Ltd.
as 5:2024cv01398
Plaintiff:
Joe Hunsinger
Defendant:
Harris & Harris, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Hunsinger v. Atmos Energy Corporation
as 3:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Joe Hunsinger
Defendant:
Atmos Energy Corporation
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Hunsinger v. Atmos Energy Corporation
as 3:2023cv02009
Plaintiff:
Joe Hunsinger
Defendant:
Atmos Energy Corporation
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hunsinger v. Provide Media Inc
as 3:2023cv01367
Plaintiff:
Joe Hunsinger
Defendant:
Provide Media, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Hunsinger v. Smart Start Real Estate Corporation
as 3:2023cv01366
Plaintiff:
Joe Hunsinger
Defendant:
Smart Start Real Estate Corporation dba Regentology
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Hunsinger v. Natural Power Sources LLC
as 3:2022cv02445
Plaintiff:
Joe Hunsinger
Defendant:
Natural Power Sources LLC doing business as Suntuity
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hunsinger v. Zeta Global Holdings Corp et al
as 3:2022cv02442
Plaintiff:
Joe Hunsinger
Defendant:
Zeta Global Holdings Corp and Apptness Media Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hunsinger v. Highland Park Investment Partners LLC
as 3:2022cv02446
Plaintiff:
Joe Hunsinger
Defendant:
Highland Park Investment Partners LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hunsinger v. Doe Corporation
as 3:2022cv02444
Plaintiff:
Joe Hunsinger
Defendant:
Doe Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
