Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Villegas v. Lumpkin
as 22-40257
Petitioner / Appellant:
Pete Joe Villegas
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Villegas v. Warden USP Beaumont
as 1:2018cv00287
Petitioner:
Pete Joe Villegas
Respondent:
Warden USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lazo et al v. M&G Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv00523
Plaintiff:
Sergio Lazo , Robert Mejia , Ricky Lee Vasquez and others
Defendant:
M&G Corporation, Integrity Mechanical Specialists, LLC, Richard Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Pete Villegas v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-20667
Petitioner - Appellant:
PETE JOE VILLEGAS
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
USA v. Pete Villega
as 14-20215
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PETE JOE VILLEGAS
Pete Villegas v. Joe Corely Detention Facility, et al
as 13-20389
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETE JOE VILLEGAS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOE CORELY DETENTION FACILITY, CHRIS STRICKLAND, GEO GROUP, INCORPORATED, Private Corporations(s) and others
Pete Villegas v. Phillip Galloway, et al
as 10-20821
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETE JOE VILLEGAS
Defendant - Appellee:
PHILLIP GALLOWAY, ELIZABETH EPPIE, M. TODD and others
Villegas v. Joe Corely Detention Facility et al
as 4:2010cv03839
Plaintiff:
Pete Joe Villegas
Defendant:
Joe Corely Detention Facility, The Geo Group, Inc., Chris Strickland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Villegas v. Galloway et al
as 4:2010cv02906
Plaintiff:
Pete Joe Villegas
Defendant:
Phillip Galloway, Elizabeth Eppie, M Todd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Villegas v United States of America
as 4:2010cv00350
Petitioner:
Pete Joe Villegas
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
