Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00908
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022at00556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Joel Ruiz-Gonzalez v. William Barr
as 20-73548
Petitioner:
JOEL RUIZ-GONZALEZ
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Carranza et al
as 1:2015at00563
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Sara Janet Carranza and Jesus Joel Ruiz, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Carranza et al
as 1:2015cv01041
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Sara Janet Carranza and Jesus Joel Ruiz, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Meghan Aguilar et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2014cv05644
Plaintiff:
Meghan Aguilar, Teddy Amstone, Sang An and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does
USA v. Joel Ruiz-Corona
as 13-50398
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOEL RUIZ-CORONA
Ruiz et al v. Hammer & Nails, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv01021
Defendant:
Hammer & Nails, LLC, Oldcastle Materials, Inc. and Staker and Parson Companies
Plaintiff:
Joel Ruiz, Joel Z. Ruiz and Maria Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Joel Ruiz v. Gap, Inc., et al
as 09-15971
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOEL RUIZ, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
GAP, INC. and VANGENT, INC.
Amicus Curiae - Pending:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and RETAIL INDUSTRY LEADERS ASSOCIATION
Ruiz v. Gap, Inc.
as 3:2007cv05739
Plaintiff:
Joel Ruiz, Joel Ruiz, Joel Ruiz and others
Defendant:
Gap, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
