Cases 41 - 50 of 351
Soto v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv04966
Plaintiff:
Luis Soto, De La Cruz and Rodriguez
Defendant:
City of New York, New York City Police Department, John/ Jane Does 1-6 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Santos v. Jones et al
as 6:2022cv06338
Plaintiff:
Byron Santos
Defendant:
Officer Jones, Sergeant D. Filighera, Sergeant Hessel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aziz v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv04113
Plaintiff:
Muhammad A. Aziz
Defendant:
The City of New York, Eugene (Gene) A. Roberts, William (Bill) Knapp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Azeez v. John/Jane Doe
as 1:2022cv06028
Petitioner:
Abdool Azeez
Respondent:
John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. Jordan, et al
as 1:2022cv04937
Plaintiff:
Jahmel J. Clark
Defendant:
Lt. Jordant, Kelly, Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sessum v. Saunders et al
as 9:2022cv00506
Plaintiff:
Daniel Sessum
Defendant:
Christopher Saunders, People of the State of New York, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daise v. Annucci et al
as 9:2022cv00459
Plaintiff:
Travis Daise
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, John/Jane Doe 1, John/Jane Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gakuba v. John/Jane Doe
as 1:2022cv01039
Petitioner:
Peter Gakuba
Respondent:
Warden John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Levesque v. Clinton County Jail et al
as 9:2022cv00083
Plaintiff:
Andre Rene Levesque
Defendant:
Clinton County Jail and John/Jane Does 1-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arroyo v. John/Jane Does #1-4
as 1:2021cv10823
Plaintiff:
Annibal Arroyo
Defendant:
John/Jane Does #1-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
