Cases 11 - 20 of 848
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rosa v. Connecticut Judicial Branch et al
as 3:2024cv00085
Defendant:
Connecticut Judicial Branch, Fairfield County, Bridgeport Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander Rosa
Grande v. Hartford Board of Education et al
as 3:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
John Grande
Defendant:
Hartford Board of Education, Leslie Torres-Rodriguez, Edward Wilson, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dippel v. Members of Congress
as 3:2023cv01619
Plaintiff:
John Van Houten Dippel
Defendant:
Members of Congress
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Clark v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2023cv01527
Plaintiff:
Gordon Clark
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Office of Governor Ned Lamont, Ned Lamont and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Castelare v. Lopez et al
as 3:2023cv01472
Plaintiff:
Devaris Castelare
Defendant:
Carlos Lopez, J. Babich and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Moreno-Cuevas v. Navarro et al
as 3:2023cv01383
Plaintiff:
Ramon Moreno-Cuevas
Defendant:
John Navarro, Herbert Ray Jenkins, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
