Cases 41 - 50 of 6,214
Wesbster v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00508
Plaintiff:
Javon Webster
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock v. Centurion Health et al
as 3:2024cv00504
Plaintiff:
Dennis Edward Hancock
Defendant:
Centurion Health and Unknown John or Jane Does #1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe #062 v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
John Doe #062
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pegues v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Sebastian Pegues
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hills v. Myers et al
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Lane Douglas Hills
Defendant:
Sheriff John Myers, Lt. Susan Taylor and Sgt. Dana Mobbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curran III v. Fronabarger et al
as 3:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
John F. (Jef) Curran III
Defendant:
Carl A. Fronabarger, Unknown Successor Trust and Jimmy L. Tate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
John Doe #061 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00493
Plaintiff:
John Doe #061
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Wooden v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv01052
Plaintiff:
John H. Wooden and Jabari I. Mandela
Defendant:
William Lee, David Raush, Frank Strada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rollins v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00486
Plaintiff:
Steve Rollins
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrow, Jr. v. Waters of McKenzie, a Rehabilitation & Nursing Center,
as 2:2024cv02244
Plaintiff:
John Morrow, Jr.
Defendant:
Waters of McKenzie, a Rehabilitation & Nursing Center doing business as The Waters of McKenzie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
