Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Anderson v. US
as 23-2224
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STANLEY M. ANDERSON, PAUL L. BAILEY, RONALD L. BLASH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
John DavisIn re: John Davis
as 23-1380
Petitioner:
In re: JOHN ROBERT DAVIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Davis v. Holbrook
as 23-162
Petitioner:
JOHN MONTY DAVIS and Larry Jerome Johnson
Respondent:
DONALD HOLBROOK, WARDEN
John DavisIn re: John Davis
as 22-5277
Petitioner:
In re: JOHN TRAION DAVIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Troy Smith, et al v. John Davis, et al
as 22-10667
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TROY SMITH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, BRENDAN C. HANEY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and GERALD E. REED, IV, indivdually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Interested Party:
JOHN W. DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
COSTA DEL MAR, INC., a Florida corporation
Troy Smith, et al v. Mitchell Miorelli, et al
as 22-10663
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TROY SMITH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, BRENDAN C. HANEY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and GERALD E. REED, IV, indivdually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Interested Party:
MITCHELL GEORGE MIORELLI, AUSTIN VALLS and JOHN W. DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
COSTA DEL MAR, INC., a Florida corporation
John Davis v. Internal Revenue Service
as 21-14155
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN FITZGERALD DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
USA v. Davis
as 21-11127
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
John Lewis Davis, II
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
United States v. John Davis
as 20-3214
Defendant / Appellant:
John E. Davis
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
