Cases 41 - 50 of 279
Jiron, et al v. Hickenlooper, et al
as 14-1055
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE M. JIRON
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN W. HICKENLOOPER, Gov., RICK RAEMISCH, D.O.C. Dir., STEVE HAGER, Dir. and others
Jiron v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2014mc00017
Plaintiff:
Lawrence M. Jiron
Defendant:
State of Colorado, David M. Thorson, Thomas K. Le Doux and others
Jiron v. Hickenlooper et al
as 1:2014mc00009
Plaintiff:
Lawrence M. Jiron
Defendant:
John W. Hickenlooper, Rick Raemisch, Steve Hager and others
Jiron v. Babcock et al
as 1:2014mc00007
Plaintiff:
Lawrence M. Jiron
Defendant:
Lewis T. Babcock, Boyd N. Boland, John W. Suthers and others
Maxsween v. Miller et al
as 1:2014cv00166
Petitioner:
Michael Francis Maxsween
Respondent:
Michael Miller, John W. Suthers, Rick Raemisch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Medicine-Blanket v. Miller, et al
as 14-1005
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES G. MEDICINE BLANKET
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL MILLER, Warden, C.C.C.F. and JOHN W. SUTHERS, The Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Ankeney et al v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2014cv00007
Plaintiff:
Randal Ankeney , Fred Dale , Daman Thompson and others
Defendant:
State of Colorado, Rick Raemisch, Roger Werholtz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fogle v. Miller et al
as 1:2013cv02759
Petitioner:
Ronald Jennings Fogle
Respondent:
Michael Miller, Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The and John W. Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Winder v. Montoya
as 1:2013cv02513
Defendant:
Allison Boyd, Cheryl Davies, Sheila (I) Montoya and others
Plaintiff:
Glenn Fisher, Josie Amaya, Carole Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. White et al
as 1:2013cv02439
Plaintiff:
Richard S. Jones
Defendant:
Joseph White, Joseph (I) White, Jennifer Covillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
